Equality, meritocracy, diversity! What does US court's ruling on ‘affirmative action’ entail for Asian-Americans?

Author:Brayden Lindrea 2023-06-30 04:10 64

The United States Supreme Court delivered a groundbreaking ruling on affirmative action, which prohibits colleges from using race as a factor in admissions decisions. This decision has ignited a fierce debate over the merits and drawbacks of affirmative action. Supporters argue that it is a necessary tool to correct historical injustices, while critics claim it is a form of discrimination. With the Court's ruling, the implications for college admissions and the pursuit of diversity are being closely examined.

Students from Washington Adventist University look at their phones as news of the Supreme Court's decision pertaining to affirmative action is released outside the U.S. Supreme Court Building on June 29, 2023 in Washington, DC.(Getty Images via AFP)

The case, filed by the Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), alleges that Harvard and UNC's admissions processes unfairly discriminate against Asian American applicants. Critics argue that these institutions prioritize racial diversity at the expense of more qualified Asian and white students. The SFFA contends that these universities' policies violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause.

From Identity Awakening to Advocacy

The decision that has stirred intense debate across the nation, the Supreme Court ruling on Harvard and UNC's affirmative action policies has ignited conflicting viewpoints among Americans.

The decision, though regarded as just by some, has also been met with frustration from many. Race is an intricate matter, entangled with a long history of racism within the US. While Black Americans continue to endure the lingering effects of their ancestors' mistreatment, it is not difficult for me to empathize with the sentiments of White and Asian Americans who feel marginalized.

The Rise of Holistic Admissions

Following the ban on affirmative action in California's public university system, institutions like Berkeley sought alternative methods to maintain diversity. The adoption of "holistic admissions" enabled universities to focus on qualitative assessments rather than solely relying on grades and test scores. However, critics argue that this approach still achieves the same outcome as affirmative action, albeit indirectly.

The Fisher Case and the Emergence of Students for Fair Admissions

Abigail Fisher's lawsuit against the University of Texas in 2012 highlighted the growing discontent surrounding race-based admissions. This case led to the establishment of Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), an organization dedicated to dismantling affirmative action. SFFA subsequently filed lawsuits against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, asserting that their admissions policies violate civil rights laws.

Asian Americans Caught in the Crossfire

Critics of affirmative action argue that it disproportionately affects Asian American applicants, limiting their chances of admission to elite universities. The cases against Harvard and UNC shed light on allegations of bias against Asian American students. Supporters of affirmative action, however, maintain that holistic admissions consider a broader range of factors beyond test scores and grades.

Clash of Perspectives

The Supreme Court's ruling has ignited a clash of perspectives. Calvin Yang, an SFFA member, shares his personal experience of being rejected from elite universities despite exceptional qualifications. Yang and others argue that Asian Americans face prejudice and stereotypes in the admissions process.

On the other hand, proponents of affirmative action contend that it ensures diversity and opportunities for historically marginalized groups.

With Supreme Court's ruling the future of race-conscious admissions hangs in the balance. The decision will undoubtedly shape the landscape of higher education and influence ongoing discussions about diversity, equity, and opportunity.

Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.

Title:Equality, meritocracy, diversity! What does US court's ruling on ‘affirmative action’ entail for Asian-Americans?

Url:https://www.investsfocus.com